| With the entry of the new
millennium, the development of Balinese art is ready to reach new heights. Putu Wirata
describes recent changes in art and culture in Bali, and identifies artists who have made significant contributions at
the end of this second millennium. In recent years, various
cultural phenomena have surfaced in Bali. The injection of mega-capital by tourism could
bring Balinese culture to the precarious edge of destruction.
The current situation does not reflect the original growth
of art culture from the coastal and rural areas of Bali in the fifteenth to sixteenth
centuries. When Dang Hyang Norartha executed 'tirta yatra' to
build holy places and to implant ritual culture, he established a heritage for all
Balinese people, a tradition that is now being threatened.
A representation of the new direction art is taking as a
result of this capital support and increasing governmental involvement can be seen in the
planned statue of Garuda Wisnu Kencana (GWK). Worked by artist Nyoman Nuarta (41), the
statue will be erected to symbolise a welcome to the third millennium. GWK will be erected
to the height of 123metres on the slope of Jimbaran Hill, 215metres from the edge of the
sea, at the centre of an amphitheatre and collection of art-shops. Indirectly, GWK will be
built in the same spirit that appears to have guided a number of different constructions
that have already been built in Bali, such as Bali Nirwana Resort in Tanah Lot, and Bali
Turtle Island Development in Serangan Island.
Even though strong opposition to the statue has been
voiced, everyone seems to be conscious that it is impossible to stop the construction of
this controversial statue. Balinese intellectual and cultural observers were shocked when
the idea was introduced in 1993, and individuals such as Ir. Nyoman Gelebet, Doctor Anak
Agung Made Djelantik, Mrs. Gedong Bagoes Oka, Drs. Putu Suata, and others expressed
criticism. The GWK project came to a standstill, at least failing to be ready for the
presentation of 'Golden
Indonesia', alias the 50-year
anniversary of Indonesian Independence Day.
It is likely, however, that GWK will find its moment of
glory at some stage in the welcoming of the third millennium. GWK is expected to be the 'landmark' of Bali, like the 'Statue of Liberty' in America, which can be easily seen by
approaching airplane passengers. Nyoman Nuarta has himself said that after the
construction of the Tower of Pisa in 1350, there were no similar prestigious works of that
dimension until the nineteenth century, with the construction of the Eiffel Tower and
Statue of Liberty.
Despite the criticism, the one who has stood behind this
project, Nyoman Nuarta, has an international reputation, and the statue demonstrates
remarkable technological sophistication. The fact that the Balinese, who are currently in
a state of transition, cannot easily accept GWK can be compared to how they still refuse
to accept the concept of 'traffic
fly-overs' and a Java-Bali bridge. They agree one hundred percent with the idea introduced
by the late governor of IB Mantra, of protecting the Balinese landscape from buildings
more than the height of a coconut tree. Socio-psychologically, the society adheres to the
cosmological view of Bali, which considers the island as a small universe, with Agung
Mountain as the 'lingga'. If the Balinese people feel that something is not in accordance
with the cosmological framework of their 'earth', the resistance becomes evident.
The mega statue GWK, however, is a huge cultural jump. From
the viewpoint of those that see statues as sacred in the holy place, it will be
problematic when the small GWK statues are sold in the art shops. Locals will also be
confronted by the 125 metre tall GWK statue, which is significantly higher than the
neighbouring sacred 'Uluwatu
Temple'.
Criticism towards GWK has taken many forms. Nyoman Gelebet,
an engineer who is known for his critical stance, considers GWK's southern position to be a problem. The ideal position according to Balinese
cosmology is to the north. Doctor Anak Agung Made Djelantik has also criticised the statue
from the viewpoint of how GWK and the other facilities around it will absorb the
government budget for electricity, water supply, roads, and land which will, gradually,
decrease the general levels of prosperity.
next page>> |